By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Cookie Policy for more information.
Jul 31, 2023
Academy of Givers

CRS activities are a powerful tool for businesses to play their part in making a positive impact. But not all CSR initiatives are the same.

Through CSR activities, a business commits to play a positive role in the community and contribute to solving social and environmental challenges. It’s a way for businesses to be part of the solution and play a role in making a positive impact.

However, if CSR aims at truly benefitting society, it cannot be thought of as a marketing tool, as a strategy to increase profit, or as a “window” to showcase the business. For CSR to be successful, agendas must integrate ethical frameworks into market strategies.

The profit-based mentality that looks at the short-term for results negatively affects the sustainability of companies and the broader economic and social system. Replacing this focus with a commitment to longer-term planning and sustainability is a major challenge that businesses need to take on. Short-term CSR strategies are often prevalent and preferred, however painting a wall and cleaning a beach – for as much as these actions are useful per se – are not sufficient to spark permanent change.

Short-term CSR is utterly incapable of addressing issues such as the climate crisis, poverty, and economic inequality. Addressing these issues in any meaningful way requires a long-term commitment and long-term strategies.

However, this exact short-term approach is the preferred one among some corporations, using CSR as a PR tactic to earn positive media coverage without making a difference.

A serious corporate pursuit of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), for example, is impossible under the short-term mindset, without making any long-lasting changes in the mentality, methodology and behaviour.

Moreover, as the actions of businesses affect a broad range of stakeholders – including employees, NGOs, and the local community – representatives of these groups should be consulted and involved in the design of CSR programs. Management-designed CSR is likely to be viewed with scepticism by many – employees included – who might doubt the sincerity of the initiatives.

The specific resources a company can apply to CSR and the needs of stakeholders involved vary greatly from company to company, from context of action to context. Therefore, for a firm to develop its own successful CSR program, the business must be taking into consideration what specific area/s it wants to tackle, who are the stakeholders involved and what resources can be put to use.

It is not the amount of money spent on CSR that counts; it is the effect that the CSR activities have on society.

CSR is also dynamic, it changes in response to changing environment, government regulations, resources at disposal etc.

Thus, a generic, one-time CSR risks being pointless. The type of CSR that is most effective for a business is a CSR that makes use of the particular assets and competencies that the business possesses and that fits the issues and dynamics of the environment where it is based.